MSCA Postdoctoral Fellowships · Independent expert review

Find out where your MSCA PF proposal loses points, and what to change.

An expert with MSCA PF panel evaluation experience, matched to your panel and topic, reviews it criterion by criterion. A written report in 12 business days. No ghostwriting, no guarantees.

I have an ESR

MSCA PF Resubmission Diagnostic

I have a draft

MSCA PF Pre-Submission Evaluation

I have a draft

MSCA PF Pre-Submission Evaluation

I have an ESR

MSCA PF Resubmission Diagnostic

Reviews across all MSCA PF panels

An expert confirmed for your panel and topic before you pay

Illustrative example · invented case

Report extract

MSCA PF Resubmission Diagnostic

Criterion 1 · Excellence

1.2 Methodology

What the ESR said

“The methodology is not described in sufficient detail.”

What it means

The comment points to one missing step, not to length. The model is never validated before it is applied, and every methodology remark follows from that.

What to change

Add a validation task with its own milestone, and refer to it where the methodology is introduced.

Also flagged, not in the ESR: the risk table does not cover the validation step.

Illustrative example · invented case

Report extract

MSCA PF Pre-Submission Evaluation

Criterion 1 · Excellence

1.2 Methodology

Rating

Good

Official scale: Excellent, Very good, Good, Fair, Poor

Expert's comment

“The validation step is described in one sentence and has no milestone. Evaluators tend to read this as a feasibility risk, not as a writing issue.”

Action

Add a validation task with its own milestone to the work plan, and refer to it from the methodology section.

Every aspect rated below Excellent comes with the expert's comment and one concrete action.

Choose your situation

Before you submit, or after the ESR.

Before submission

MSCA PF Pre-Submission Evaluation

You have a complete or nearly complete draft. An expert scores it criterion by criterion and tells you what to fix before the deadline.

From 524 EUR

plus VAT where applicable · 12 business days

See the evaluation

After the ESR

MSCA PF Resubmission Diagnostic

You applied, were not funded and have the ESR. An expert reads it with your Part B1 and tells you what cost you points, what the ESR does not say and what to change for the next call.

From 419 EUR

plus VAT where applicable · 12 business days

See the diagnostic

Your host institution can pay. We issue the agreement and the invoice to the university or research centre.

Feedback from 2026 clients

What clients say

100%

of clients who answered our feedback form would recommend us

4.8 out of 5

for how actionable they found the report

…thanks to their report I was able to correct and refocus my proposal, understand what had actually gone wrong the previous year, what the evaluators' ESR highlighted, and what they would have expected to see.

LIF panel client, France
MSCA PF Resubmission Diagnostic, 2026

The review was rigorous, constructive, and remarkably insightful, helping me refine an already advanced proposal and strengthen it in ways I had not fully considered.

ENG panel client, Czech Republic
MSCA PF Pre-Submission Evaluation, 2026

How it works

No payment until your expert is confirmed.

01

Tell us your case

Fill in the short form. We confirm an expert for your panel and topic before you pay anything.

02

Agreement and payment

You accept a short service agreement and pay, or your host institution does.

03

Your evaluation

Upload your documents. Your report arrives within 12 business days, and you have a week to ask us questions about it.

AI can help you write. We tell you whether it will score.

Use AI to brainstorm, structure and polish. It works from the guidelines. Our experts work from having scored real proposals.

Where AI helps

  • Brainstorming and outlining
  • Drafting and polishing sections
  • Checking the text against the guidelines

Where an expert adds

  • Whether your concept is competitive in your panel
  • Which aspects will lose points, and why
  • What to fix first

“This reads as 3.5 out of 5 in Excellence, not 4.5.”

How an expert calibrates a score

Who evaluates your proposal

Experts who have scored MSCA PF proposals, matched to your panel and topic.

Matched to your research area, not an adjacent field. Every assignment is checked for conflicts of interest, and the expert's identity is never disclosed.

Independent

We have no link to the European Commission or its agencies and no influence on any official evaluation.

Confidential

Your materials are used only for this service. They reach only the expert assigned to your case, who signs an agreement with confidentiality clauses before receiving anything.

You stay the author

We evaluate and explain. We do not write proposals.

About GrantLever

For universities, research centres and companies

We evaluate proposals for institutions and invoice the institution directly.

For the MSCA PF candidates you host, one by one or as a group. Tell us the call, the number of proposals and the deadline, and we reply with a proposal by email.

New to the MSCA PF? Start here

Download the MSCA PF Guide 2027: the numbers of the last three calls, how proposals are scored and where they lose points.

Questions?

Contact us and we’ll help you.