MSCA PF Resubmission Diagnostic
What's included:
Deep analysis of proposal + Evaluation Summary Report
Honest recommendation: Resubmit / Risky / Not advised
Section-by-section fixes (Excellence, Impact, Implementation)
Priority action roadmap
Email Q&A follow-up (48h response)
You scored 70-85/100 but not funded.
Most resubmissions fail because candidates can't see what evaluators saw.
Honest evaluator analysis of your proposal + ESR to answer the critical question: go or no-go?
From 380€ | 10-12 days turnaround
[LIMITED AVAILABILITY]
Most Resubmissions Fail Because Candidates Can't Self-Diagnose
Your ESR says: "Methodology could be stronger"
You think: "I'll rewrite that section"
Real evaluator sees:
"This is not a writing problem. This is a serious problem.”
But what methodology issues SPECIFICALLY?
- Lack of validation experiments?
- Sample size too small?
- Controls missing?
Without evaluator perspective, you're guessing.
Resubmission isn't about rewriting.
It's about fixing what ACTUALLY lost you points.
We interpret ESR from evaluator perspective.
AI can't do this. You can't do this alone.
How It Works
1. Submit
Upload proposal + ESR + answer short questionnaire
2. Expert Analysis (10-12 days)
Evaluator analyzes proposal + ESR + scores
3. Receive Diagnostic (6-8 page report)
Recommendation + Section fixes + Priority actions
Executive recommendation
Identification of critical weaknesses
Interpretation of evaluator comments
Strategic guidance on what must change
Written diagnostic report
[Starting from 380€ for standard cases]
Strong case (Top 5%):
- Score 85+/100
- Above threshold but not funded due to competition
- Clear understanding of what section lost points
Resubmission highly recommended
Should You Resubmit?
Viable case (Top 15%):
- Score 75-84/100
- Fixable weaknesses in specific sections
- Willing to invest 60-100h refining
Resubmission viable if you address root cause
Uncertain:
- Score 65-74/100
- Unclear what specifically failed
- Considering major changes (host/panel/concept)
This is exactly what this diagnostic answers
Not recommended
- Score <65/100
- Fundamental concept issues
- Better start fresh with new concept
Knowing IF you should resubmit ≠ Knowing WHAT to fix.
ESR tells you score. It doesn't tell you:
- Which specific weaknesses cost you points
- Whether they're fixable or fundamental
- How much effort realistic fix requires
- If changing host/panel makes sense
That's what this diagnostic answers.
We give honest recommendation -”even if it's "don't resubmit."
Common Questions
Q: I scored 75/100. Should I automatically resubmit?
A: Not automatically. Depends on WHERE you lost points. If Excellence was weak, concept has issues. If Impact/Implementation weak, more fixable. We diagnose which.
Q: What if you recommend NOT resubmitting?
A: We tell you why + suggest alternatives (different scheme, concept pivot, host change). Better to know now than waste months.
Q: How is this different from rereading my ESR?
A: ESR tells you WHAT evaluators didn't like. We tell you WHY and HOW to fix it - from evaluator perspective, not candidate guess.
More questions? Contact us!
Not Sure If Resubmission Makes Sense?
Book a FREE 15min case diagnostic call.
Type “Call me” in Additional Comments
Resubmission pre-qualification form
🔒 YOUR WORK STAYS CONFIDENTIAL
- All evaluators under signed NDA
- Documents anonymized before review
- Files permanently deleted after service
- Full details in our Privacy Policy
Questions? Contact us